{"id":723,"date":"2026-07-02T10:43:35","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T10:43:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723"},"modified":"2026-07-02T10:43:35","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T10:43:35","slug":"the-alarming-split-in-the-supreme-courts-birthright-citizenship-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723","title":{"rendered":"The alarming split in the Supreme Court\u2019s birthright citizenship ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relief flooded much of the nation on Tuesday morning as the Supreme Court released its decision upholding birthright citizenship, ending the 2025-26 session with a blow to President Donald Trump and his immigration policy.<\/p>\n

Read more Political parties can now spend unlimited money supporting candidates<\/a><\/p>\n

The justices on Tuesday ruled 6-3 in the landmark case that called into question the very foundation of American citizenship and identity. Lawyers and advocates have lamented that this bedrock principle was even up for debate, let alone affirmed by anything less than unanimity among the justices. But a deeper look into the decision shows that only five of the justices ultimately upheld the Constitution \u2014 and that should concern every American.<\/p>\n

In Trump v. Barbara, the justices had the task of determining whether Trump\u2019s first-day executive order violated the 14th Amendment\u2019s citizenship clause or federal law. The order declared that individuals born in the United States did not automatically receive citizenship if their parents had insufficient legal status and instructed federal agencies against recognizing citizenship claims of a child born after Feb. 20, 2025, if their parents lacked sufficient status.<\/p>\n

In federal court last spring, three families challenged the executive order on behalf of themselves and others in their positions, arguing that the order unlawfully stripped their children of citizenship. Last July, a U.S. District Court judge for the District of New Hampshire blocked the order from taking effect during litigation and certified a class of affected children.<\/p>\n

Chief Justice John Roberts authored the majority opinion, in which Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined, affirming the lower court decision and holding broadly that the 14th Amendment\u2019s citizenship clause ensured that any child born in the United States had the guarantee of citizenship.<\/p>\n

\u201cCitizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights \u2014 to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the 14th Amendment extended that promise to \u2018every free-born person in this land,\u2019\u201d Roberts wrote in . \u201cWe keep that promise today.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe idea that a president can rewrite the Constitution by executive order is a pretty radical one, and to have only five justices [agree] is surprising.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

That the decision to uphold the Constitution \u2014 to interpret the 14th Amendment\u2019s \u201csubject to the jurisdiction\u201d language as within the boundaries of the U.S. \u2014 wasn\u2019t unanimous startled several legal experts.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis really should have been a 9-0,\u201d Aarti Kohli, executive director for the Asian Legal Caucus, told me. \u201cThe idea that a president can rewrite the Constitution by executive order is a pretty radical one, and to have only five justices [agree] is surprising.\u201d<\/p>\n

Justice Brett Kavanaugh was the outlier in the decision, agreeing with the court\u2019s judgment but disagreeing with its justification. Yes, the president\u2019s executive order was unlawful, but not because it was unconstitutional, Kavanaugh essentially said, noting he did not find the order violated the amendment. Instead, it violated section 1401 of Title VIII, which reiterated the principles of the 14th Amendment alongside four exceptions established in the 1898 Supreme Court decision U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark.<\/p>\n

\u201cWong Kim Ark\u2019s treatment of the exceptions as a \u2018closed set\u2019 is incorrect, in my view,\u201d he wrote. \u201cConsidering the four exceptions as a permanently frozen or closed set as of the 14th Amendment\u2019s ratification in 1868 \u2014 such that there can be no subsequent exceptions recognized based on new developments after 1868 \u2014 is inconsistent with the Court\u2019s longstanding approach to constitutional interpretation in a variety of areas.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Trump administration\u2019s excluding children born to parents with temporary or undocumented status from birthright citizenship could be an additional exception under the Constitution if the court had chosen to rule narrowly and follow that approach, Kavanaugh asserted.<\/p>\n

But Kavanaugh\u2019s interpretation of the law, should it have been the majority\u2019s, would have opened the door for more legal challenges to birthright citizenship because it expressly denied it as a constitutional right, Kohli said.<\/p>\n

The majority opinion, however, ensures that lawmakers can\u2019t just end the citizenship provision without having the support needed to pass a constitutional amendment, and the current makeup of Congress means such an outcome is incredibly unlikely. As it stands, Kavanaugh\u2019s opinion still serves as a reminder to federal lawmakers that, should they seek to impose more exceptions on birthright citizenship through proposed legislation amending the statute, they could.<\/p>\n

As Kavanaugh noted, however, \u201cOver the last 30 years, Congress has considered numerous proposed bills to alter birthright citizenship, but Congress has never actually passed such legislation.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more \u201cI don\u2019t get involved\u201d: Trump dodges questions about over $1 billion in crypto profits<\/a><\/p>\n

Still, a wide gap separates Kavanaugh\u2019s dissent from those of his other conservative colleagues \u2014 Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito \u2014 who denied altogether that the Constitution guaranteed birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents with temporary or undocumented status.<\/p>\n

While Alito and Thomas\u2019 opinions both repeated Trump administration claims about the Constitution requiring one to domicile \u2014 or maintain legal, long-term residence \u2014 in the U.S., they differed in the concerns they raised surrounding birthright citizenship.<\/p>\n

During oral argument on April 1, the Trump administration claimed that the 14th Amendment had never been interpreted to guarantee citizenship to children born to parents with undocumented or temporary status because those children are not exclusively \u201csubject to the jurisdiction\u201d of the U.S. as described in the Constitution. Counsel for the administration argued that that language describes \u201cowing direct and immediate allegiance\u201d to the country.<\/p>\n

\n

The four disagreeing justices, and the potential for the court to lean more conservative in the future, add fuel to a fire that could further push the nation back into a discriminatory sociopolitical climate multiple generations of Americans have fought to topple.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Alito\u2019s dissent contended that a child could only not \u201cbe subject to any foreign power\u201d if no other country would \u201cautomatically\u201d render them a national, asserting that many children born to undocumented immigrants also enjoy blood-based citizenship through their parents. The current birthright citizenship policy also \u201cencourages \u2018birth tourism\u2019 \u2014 the practice of traveling here with temporary authorization solely to give birth and obtain citizenship for one\u2019s children, then returning to raise them in another country,\u201d Alito alleged.<\/p>\n

In the more than 90-page principal dissent, in which Gorsuch joined, Thomas also argued that the original goals of the 14th Amendment limited its application to only newly freed African Americans in 1868.<\/p>\n

\u201cBlacks were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans. They had no other homeland, owed no allegiance to any foreign power, and were subject to no other authority,\u201d Thomas wrote, adding: \u201cThe Citizenship Clause thus guaranteed them the \u2018dignity and glory of American citizenship,\u2019 so as to ensure that they would never be treated as second class under the law. The same could not be said for the children of foreign temporary visitors.\u201d<\/p>\n

The majority opinion roundly rejected Alito and Thomas\u2019 arguments about domicile.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf Congress intended to limit American citizenship to the children of those domiciled in the United States, nothing in the succinct language of the Citizenship Clause conveyed that design,\u201d Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. \u201cWords appearing frequently in the Executive Order \u2014 \u2018mother,\u2019 \u2018father,\u2019 \u2018lawful,\u2019 \u2018temporary\u2019\u2014 are absent from the Clause. For a simple reason: they did not matter.\u201d<\/p>\n

And that rejection was for good reason, Betsy Fisher, advocacy counsel for national nonprofit United Stateless, told Salon. \u201cIt would be both extremely harmful,\u201d likely rendering thousands of children nationwide stateless because they wouldn\u2019t have citizenship in the U.S. or their parents\u2019 home country, and \u201cdeeply unadministrable, extremely complicated and inefficient to apply in practice.\u201d<\/p>\n

Jackson also issued a scathing rebuke of Thomas\u2019 dissent in her concurrence, noting the irony that Thomas, who has long taken a colorblind perspective in rulings, thought the framers of the Constitution sought to limit the application of the 14th Amendment along racial lines.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis alternative account pitches Black Americans against immigrants when the advocates who promoted the 14th Amendment did no such thing,\u201d Jackson wrote. \u201cFreed Blacks fought for the shared humanity of all people. And the Great Emancipator eventually foresaw that the only path forward that could prevent a return \u2014 in any form \u2014 to slavery and race-based subordination was to link the fates of all.\u201d<\/p>\n

Jackson\u2019s latter point is, in large part, what makes the fact that the court ultimately made a constitutional determination and upheld the 14th Amendment so important \u2014 and the number of justices who disagreed alarming. The crop of Americans seeking to end birthright citizenship and advocate for similar changes to the country show no signs of changing course, even in the face of this ruling. The four disagreeing justices, and the potential for the court to lean more conservative in the future, add fuel to a fire that could further push the nation back into a discriminatory sociopolitical climate multiple generations of Americans have fought to topple.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe birthright citizenship executive order is part of a bigger attempt to change who Americans are and who belongs and who decides,\u201d Fisher said. \u201cReally emphatically rejecting that [precedent] is important to maintaining this idea that the United States is a place where people can belong, where we can live with each other across difference, and that\u2019s what birthright citizenship does for us.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more MAGA is turning SCOTUS loss into the existential crisis it needed<\/a><\/p>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The ruling was a revealing moment for the future of the court<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":722,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[144,208,8,1003,1037,674,147,14],"class_list":["post-723","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interesting","tag-14th-amendment","tag-analysis","tag-birthright-citizenship","tag-brett-kavanaugh","tag-clarence-thomas","tag-constitution","tag-immigration","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe alarming split in the Supreme Court\u2019s birthright citizenship ruling - Relocation Across America<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The alarming split in the Supreme Court\u2019s birthright citizenship ruling - Relocation Across America\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The ruling was a revealing moment for the future of the court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Relocation Across America\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T10:43:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ba2572fa1a7a241291fdc36bdae80fcf\"},\"headline\":\"The alarming split in the Supreme Court\u2019s birthright citizenship ruling\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T10:43:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723\"},\"wordCount\":1576,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/d2a1801ed9e3c672dc1a2cd2acc57a0a.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"14th Amendment\",\"Analysis\",\"Birthright Citizenship\",\"Brett Kavanaugh\",\"Clarence Thomas\",\"Constitution\",\"Immigration\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Interesting\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723\",\"name\":\"The alarming split in the Supreme Court\u2019s birthright citizenship ruling - Relocation Across America\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/d2a1801ed9e3c672dc1a2cd2acc57a0a.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T10:43:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ba2572fa1a7a241291fdc36bdae80fcf\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/d2a1801ed9e3c672dc1a2cd2acc57a0a.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/d2a1801ed9e3c672dc1a2cd2acc57a0a.jpg\",\"width\":1692,\"height\":1142},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?p=723#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The alarming split in the Supreme Court\u2019s birthright citizenship ruling\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Relocation Across America\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ba2572fa1a7a241291fdc36bdae80fcf\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/relocationacrossamerica.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The alarming split in the Supreme Court\u2019s birthright citizenship ruling - Relocation Across America","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The alarming split in the Supreme Court\u2019s birthright citizenship ruling - Relocation Across America","og_description":"The ruling was a revealing moment for the future of the court","og_url":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723","og_site_name":"Relocation Across America","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T10:43:35+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ba2572fa1a7a241291fdc36bdae80fcf"},"headline":"The alarming split in the Supreme Court\u2019s birthright citizenship ruling","datePublished":"2026-07-02T10:43:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723"},"wordCount":1576,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/d2a1801ed9e3c672dc1a2cd2acc57a0a.jpg","keywords":["14th Amendment","Analysis","Birthright Citizenship","Brett Kavanaugh","Clarence Thomas","Constitution","Immigration","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Interesting"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723","url":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723","name":"The alarming split in the Supreme Court\u2019s birthright citizenship ruling - Relocation Across America","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/d2a1801ed9e3c672dc1a2cd2acc57a0a.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-02T10:43:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ba2572fa1a7a241291fdc36bdae80fcf"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/d2a1801ed9e3c672dc1a2cd2acc57a0a.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/d2a1801ed9e3c672dc1a2cd2acc57a0a.jpg","width":1692,"height":1142},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?p=723#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The alarming split in the Supreme Court\u2019s birthright citizenship ruling"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/","name":"Relocation Across America","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ba2572fa1a7a241291fdc36bdae80fcf","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com"],"url":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=723"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/723\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/relocationacrossamerica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}